<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The goal that wasn&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joysandsorrows.co.uk/2009/08/the-goal-that-wasnt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joysandsorrows.co.uk/2009/08/the-goal-that-wasnt/</link>
	<description>Following Blues From Near and Far</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:02:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.joysandsorrows.co.uk/2009/08/the-goal-that-wasnt/comment-page-1/#comment-2535</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joysandsorrows.co.uk/?p=883#comment-2535</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ll be having popcorn, hot dogs and root beer next......mmm....Beer!...... And don&#039;t forget the cheerleaders. Ra!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll be having popcorn, hot dogs and root beer next&#8230;&#8230;mmm&#8230;.Beer!&#8230;&#8230; And don&#8217;t forget the cheerleaders. Ra!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaje</title>
		<link>http://www.joysandsorrows.co.uk/2009/08/the-goal-that-wasnt/comment-page-1/#comment-2524</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joysandsorrows.co.uk/?p=883#comment-2524</guid>
		<description>Spot on, Steve. People don&#039;t seem to realise that we have those breaks during games when something controversial happens, there is always a period of a couple of minutes where the 4th official could easily consult a replay of the incident, before relaying the decision back to the referee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on, Steve. People don&#8217;t seem to realise that we have those breaks during games when something controversial happens, there is always a period of a couple of minutes where the 4th official could easily consult a replay of the incident, before relaying the decision back to the referee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve hill</title>
		<link>http://www.joysandsorrows.co.uk/2009/08/the-goal-that-wasnt/comment-page-1/#comment-2522</link>
		<dc:creator>steve hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joysandsorrows.co.uk/?p=883#comment-2522</guid>
		<description>about time delay in referee decision making with tv technology. if you watch the incident the referee spoke to his linesman a good 2 minutes, is that not time delaying ? there would be no difference to talk to 4th official with a monitor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>about time delay in referee decision making with tv technology. if you watch the incident the referee spoke to his linesman a good 2 minutes, is that not time delaying ? there would be no difference to talk to 4th official with a monitor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The goal that wasn’t &#124; Bristol Travel - Culture and Recreation</title>
		<link>http://www.joysandsorrows.co.uk/2009/08/the-goal-that-wasnt/comment-page-1/#comment-2510</link>
		<dc:creator>The goal that wasn’t &#124; Bristol Travel - Culture and Recreation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joysandsorrows.co.uk/?p=883#comment-2510</guid>
		<description>[...] You find the original post here www.joysandsorrows.co.uk/2009/ &#124; Aylesburyblue [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You find the original post here <a href="http://www.joysandsorrows.co.uk/2009/" rel="nofollow">http://www.joysandsorrows.co.uk/2009/</a> | Aylesburyblue [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat</title>
		<link>http://www.joysandsorrows.co.uk/2009/08/the-goal-that-wasnt/comment-page-1/#comment-2508</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joysandsorrows.co.uk/?p=883#comment-2508</guid>
		<description>Maybe I should clear one or two things up.

Firstly I&#039;m not condemning Bristol City for their course of action within a game. I did think today about how I would&#039;ve reacted had the same happened against my team if I was playing, and in my heart of hearts I couldn&#039;t decide. However the ideal situation for me would&#039;ve been for you to let the goal be scored. It does look badly on you that you have effectively stole three points.

I don&#039;t buy the argument that there was an infringement and that was why it was disallowed. I&#039;m sorry but if that was the case it would&#039;ve been cleared up with that explanation by now. The fact was it was a grave error of judgement and could&#039;ve been recitified. Your own players knew what had happened, you only need to look at their immediate reactions to see this.

To the poster who talked about the time delay in decision making with technology, we are already experiencing these delays on the increasingly regular occasions match officials confer with eachother, but they aren&#039;t having huge effects on the pace of a game, even though these conferences can last up to around half a minute-do you really think it would take much longer than that to see if a ball has crossed a goaline?

And comparing it to the introduction of substitutes bewilders me to be honest. I don&#039;t see the relavence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I should clear one or two things up.</p>
<p>Firstly I&#8217;m not condemning Bristol City for their course of action within a game. I did think today about how I would&#8217;ve reacted had the same happened against my team if I was playing, and in my heart of hearts I couldn&#8217;t decide. However the ideal situation for me would&#8217;ve been for you to let the goal be scored. It does look badly on you that you have effectively stole three points.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t buy the argument that there was an infringement and that was why it was disallowed. I&#8217;m sorry but if that was the case it would&#8217;ve been cleared up with that explanation by now. The fact was it was a grave error of judgement and could&#8217;ve been recitified. Your own players knew what had happened, you only need to look at their immediate reactions to see this.</p>
<p>To the poster who talked about the time delay in decision making with technology, we are already experiencing these delays on the increasingly regular occasions match officials confer with eachother, but they aren&#8217;t having huge effects on the pace of a game, even though these conferences can last up to around half a minute-do you really think it would take much longer than that to see if a ball has crossed a goaline?</p>
<p>And comparing it to the introduction of substitutes bewilders me to be honest. I don&#8217;t see the relavence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

